Irish Health and Safety Law - 1327 Words

Before 1989 Ireland had very little laws in place for the safety and health of the people at work. Any law that was in place for this was in place for factory and mine workers only. In 1989 a new act was implemented by the Irish Government to cover all people performing any type of work, this was called The Health, Safety and Welfare at Work Act. This Act was then replaced by a newer edition in 2005. My assignment will outline the laws stated in both acts. In 1989 an Act was brought into Irish legislation called the Health and Safety and Welfare at Work Act. It was created to cover all people who carried out ‘work’. Employers, employees in all places of work and to the self employed. As stated in the 1989 Act a place of work was ‘any,†¦show more content†¦The legislation under this Act states that every employer must, as soon as possible, prepare a statement in writing which is known as a safety statement. In this statement the employer must describe the way in which the safety, health and welfare in the workplace shall be secured. The safety statement should include how the employer intends to comply with the 2005 Act. It should contain a summary of the safety and health goals and objectives in the workplace, a list of responsibilities and the means of achieving the aims and objectives (Moffatt, 2006). If the safety inspector finds the safety statement to be inadequate he may order it to be revised. Also, w ith the increasing number of non national workers it may be required to have the safety statement in more than one language. It is a criminal offence not to have a safety statement for the workplace. Employers (including self-employed) are responsible for creating and maintaining a safe and healthy workplace as mentioned in the 1989 Act. Some of the duties the employers must carry out under the 2005 Act are defined by the term â€Å"reasonably practicable†. This statement means that the person has applied all due care when, having identified the hazards and assessed the risks at the workplace, has taken all necessary protective and preventive methods. Under the 2005 Act the duties of an employee include compliance of all the relevant legislation setShow MoreRelatedApple Inc. : Ethics, Leadership, Corporate Social Responsibility And Triple Bottom Line Reporting And Globalization1261 Words   |  6 PagesGlobalization. I. Addressing the needs of its employees. Meeting the needs of the employees and maintaining a profit margin. APPLE priorities health to assure a presentable employee who will create a relationship with the customers assuring them a comfortable work environment and addressing their needs. For example, they are offered with health insurances such as health, dental, and optical insurances. APPLE offers a 401k plan that consists of 14 funds offering the best way to save money in a taxable wayRead MoreThe Outside Dynamic Environment Punctuating Public Sector Organisations1142 Words   |  5 Pagesbasis of making a profit and shareholder accountability, it is goal driven, profit motivation and reward orientated. In the public sector â€Å"an action of helping or doing work for someone† is supplying a public need such as transport, communications or health service. It is a service provided to the population with greater public scrutiny and is not profit motivated. Public sector organisations are agents of the state to do the states business and are not in a position to make a profit; they are mandatedRead MoreA Basic Understanding Of Irish Law3020 Words   |  13 PagesTo address this question, a basic understanding of Irish law with all its complexities and contradictions is necessary. Irish law lays the foundations for all aspects of life within Irish society and just as society itself is constantly evolving, so too is Irish law as it is being constantly updated, reviewed and amended to keep up with the times and a modernising society. This essay will focus solely on the education sector and the respective underpinning principals which guide, direct and influenceRead MoreEssay on L egislation: Health, Safety, and Welfare in the Workplace983 Words   |  4 PagesLegislation Health, Safety and Welfare at Work Act 2005 Health, Safety and Welfare are applicable both to the employer and the employee in the work place. The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) enforces Health and Safety procedures and monitors compliance. The HSA provide a number of services to employers, employees and the public, including: †¢ workplace inspections and monitoring for compliance †¢ investigations into serious accidents †¢ providing information service †¢ develop new laws and standardsRead MoreThe Effects Of Workplace Safety On Organizations And Society989 Words   |  4 PagesUnderstanding the importance of workplace safety prevention is critical in the study of occupational health and safety. Workplace violence is a term used to describe a situation in which an individual experiences verbal abuse, threatening behaviour, harassment, or physical assault in their place of employment or business-related functions or events (OSH Answers Fact Sheet). This is a common occurrence in many workplaces and has a significant impact on the employees mental state, interfering withRead MoreDetermining the Safety of Different Genetically Modified Food1762 Words   |  7 Pagestrait [2]. Safety of GM foods Determining the safety of different GM foods cannot be generalised as different GM foods contain different genes in which are inserted in different ways. For this reason, the safety of GM foods must be assessed individually. The GM foods in which are currently available on international markets have all been risk assessed for safety and have shown to present little to no risk to human health. Likewise, there have been no reported effects on human health as a resultRead MoreExternal Quality Assurance1097 Words   |  4 Pageseither governmental or industry authorities. A significant amount of external quality assurance is mandated by law, so legal concerns are important to take into consideration. When external bodies are charged with maintaining quality assurance, there can be significant penalties for non-compliance. A restaurant with poor sanitation can be shut down; a transportation company with a poor safety record can face penalties or license revocation. In some cases, the ext ernal quality body is linked to an organisationRead MoreThe Legal Drinking Age Of America977 Words   |  4 Pagestheir drink orders. The first words articulated out the woman’s mouth are spoken with a deep, thick, Irish accent. I could not help but acknowledge it and after chatting for a few minutes, I come to learn that they had just arrived from the airport and are vacationing in Florida for two weeks. After taking both parents drink orders, I ask their son what he would like to drink. Like the true Irish man he is, he asks me for a Guinness. He looked a little young to be drinking so I asked him for someRead MoreWe Need A Gun License951 Words   |  4 Pageslife. Despite their right to bear arms responsibly, they went against the law to kill someone that was no threat to them. Why are they allowed to do this? (Pause) Unlike the Republican’s, I believe we should run background checks on the people purchasing the firearms. I’m not here to take away your guns, I’m here to help keep the citizens of America safe. I believe that people should get a gun license to insure the safety of everyone. Why should we let an unlicensed person walk around with a gunRead MoreThe Impact of Eu on the Irish Legal System2622 Words   |  11 PagesTABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction 1 Section 2 EU LAW – Primary Legislation 2 2.1 Treaty of Rome 2 2.2 The Single European Act 2 2.3 The Maastricht Treaty 3 2.4 The Amsterdam Treaty 3 2.5 The Nice Treaty 3 2.6 The Lisbon Treaty 3 Section 3 EU LAW – Secondary Legislation 3.1 Regulations 4 3.2 Directives 4 3.3 Decisions 5 3.4 Recommendations, Opinions and Resolutions 5 Section 4 Crotty v. An Taoiseach - A Landmark Case. 7 Conclusion 9

Rise and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty free essay sample

The Tsar set up a system of government involving an imperial council, a small cabinet of ministers and a senate; all of which were implemented as personal advisers and delegates. The Tsar had control over who was appointed and dismissed, and no one challenged the power of the governmental system. To ensure the country operated effectively, a bureaucracy, merely consisting of the noble and upper classes put official policies into place. Many believed the bureaucrats were corrupt collecting bribes along with their wages. Practical measures were also needed to be taken in order to enforce Russian autocracy. While the police maintained law and order, the Tsars organised secret police called the Okhrana, for the surveillance of revolutionaries and anarchists while also censoring certain information and activities. The Russian Orthodox Church was a major influence in instigating the tsar’s autocratic powers. As the primary religion of Russia, the church claimed that it was the Tsar’s ‘divine right’ to rule and that his autocratic powers were derived from God. The church taught the Russian people to embrace autocracy and to love and obey the Tsar’s supreme power. The Tsar was described as being a dictatorial emperor and that neither a constitution nor other institutions limited the Tsar’s authority. The sudden outbreak of World War One was a great reflection of Nicholas II and his inefficiency commanding Russia. Before the war even began, hundreds of thousands of people had started to grow restless with the government. Many strikes and public demonstrations began to occur within the Russian borders constantly protesting for better working and living conditions. Many started to revolt and the citizens had their sights set on a change of government. Strong socialist and liberal encounters occurred for the Tsar and when he consistently brought disappoint and humiliation to the nation, much of the state grew sick of the tsarist rule. A major strike movement largely influenced by the humiliating defeat by the Japanese instigated the revolution of 1905. This day on January 9th was given the name ‘bloody Sunday’ as thousands of protestors marched on the Tsar’s palace and were massacred by members of the Russian military. This hint of a revolution resulted in the Tsar introducing an elected legislative assembly called a Duma in the parliament. However, even with a more efficient parliament, the uprisings continued throughout the year and for years to come with growing political discontent sending Russia on the verge of a national crisis. Then war broke out in 1914 saving the government from a large revolutionary movement and the country suddenly became fixated on an external enemy. This war deeply reflected the inadequacy of Russia’s military and economy. Almost a quarter of the army had not been issued with rifles and shortages of ammunitions, food and supplies became an epidemic. After endless defeats on the battlefield, many knew that the Russian army was fighting a 20th century war with 19th century training and inadequate equipment. As a result, the government strained to withstand the economic pressures, with the war costing 5 times the annual budget. Then in 1915, Nicholas II went to the battlefront as commander in chief leaving Alexandra in control of the government back in Russia. The Tsarina frequently took advice from Gregory Rasputin also referred to as the ‘mad monk’, who many believed became so influential, that he in fact was governing Russia. Meanwhile, problems in Russia began to exacerbate with increased prices, economic hardships, a decline in living standards and a growing domestic frustration which provoked more civil unrest. By 1916, dissatisfaction within Russian monarch had reached boiling point. Rasputin was murdered by the Tsar’s own cousins and the majority of the parliament and upper classes ‘were no longer willing to meet expectations of loyalty, respect and patriotism. Even though the Russian Revolution transpired quite suddenly, the foundations of it may have started centuries earlier. Since the 1700s, the ideas of European regime had begun to influence the minds of Russian citizens. Lower classes began to believe in democratic rights and equality, newspapers and books spread concepts about universal rights and many believed in a future with a just ruler and a more cultured society. From the 1800s, the Russian monarchy gradually became weaker and increasingly fragile. After the death of Alexander I in 1825, a group of Decembrists made up of thousands of soldiers seized advantage of a succession issue and demanded reforms plus a written constitution. This displayed a hint of light and prompted many to rethink the government system and their place within the hierarchy. Then after the death of Nicholas I in 1855, Alexander II rose to power and was referred to as the ‘great liberator’ after emancipating the Russian serfs in 1861. While the act earned Alexander public affection and respect, it angered landowners, created an economic crisis and also left the people wanting more. Some revolutionary groups then pursued a constitution, and after the emperor’s assassination in 1881, his successor Alexander III began to crackdown on public opposition and upheaval. The new Tsar was seen as an oppressor who tightened restrictions and enforced new policies that drove thousands out of the country. When Nicholas II rose to power in 1894, he was faced with intense resentment from the people. His ineffective ruling was the tip of the iceberg for most of the country and when the 1905 rebellion began, the emperor was forced to make more changes. The duma was introduced and civil liberties such as freedom of speech, protection and assembly were endorsed. A parliament was created on the basis of election which challenged the Tsar’s autocratic power. There were also growing pressures involving communism and socialism particularly after the split of the Russian Social Democratic Party which created the two major revolutionary groups of the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. Despite both groups in support Marxism, the Bolsheviks with communist ideologies, were growing as the largest political rivals and the most radical revolutionary group in Russia. In addition, when the October manifesto was issued religion became a more flexible issue gaining support from Liberals who were searching for maximum individual freedom. This gave much of the nation a glimpse of a reforming government and a new hope for the future. Once the war started and tensions flared again, Nicholas II may have been the Russian leader; however only a very little population followed him. By 1914, Alexander Kerensky was in fact the parliament’s most illustrious radical who largely objected Russia’s involvement in the war. He was convinced that the country needed a major change and he openly called upon the emperor to step down at the end of 1916. While Kerensky was a great revolutionary leader, Vladimir Lenin was one of the major political figures and mastermind of the 1917 Revolution. Lenin led the Bolsheviks who had taken power in most of Russia and introduced communist rule by the beginning of the revolution. Lenin further went on to become the first head of the new republic of the Soviet Union. It is without doubt that Nicholas II was a major player in the Russian revolution and the fall of the renowned Romanov dynasty. For centuries, Russia believed in autocracy, but it was Nicholas’ objectionable beliefs and actions in maintaining his Tsarist rule, that ultimately lost the support of his people leading to the inevitable revolution. When Nicholas ascended to the throne it was clear he knew little about commanding millions of people. He was known for making poor decisions when it came to politics, the economy and military. Despite this, Nicholas gained confidence and inner power from the belief that his autocracy was a gift from God. Growing up in a Romanov family, came the belief that the Tsar was called to be God’s representative on earth and that it was their ‘divine right’ to rule. For Nicholas to object his autocratic power would mean that he would fail in his duty to Russia and his family, as well as in his duty to God and the church. As well as having unlimited power over the state, Nicholas II had full control over the Orthodox Church and the Okhrana. These two groups were so influential in the 1900’s and would assist the emperor in any controversial or scandalous matter. After Nicholas’ predecessors, in particular Alexander II, the new emperor felt grave pressure in pleasing the Russian people. Despite introducing the duma, the Tsar later has it dissolved because he was not willing to give up his unlimited power. With the country constantly on the brink of civil unrest and revolts, this move reflected Nicholas’ poor decision making and his need for superiority. Many would argue that Nicholas II abused his autocratic authority and failed to keep up with other western powers. Before the revolution, Russia was mainly a large agricultural country, and it wasn’t until the 1900s that the country started to industrialise. Because of the lack of modernism, Russia was unable to survive the war and withstand its repercussions. When people started to focus on the war, the discontent towards Tsarist rule eased down, however it was once again Nicholas’ decisions that angered the Russian public and military even further. As the war was nearing its end, Russian anarchists and revolutionaries had already reached the point of no return. By 1917, hundreds of social activists and the majority of the working class had gone on strike, protesting in the streets. Students, farmers and the majority of the nobility joined in the demonstrations as the outbursts became more frequent. When Nicholas was informed of the seriousness of the events, he commanded General Khabalov to impose any force necessary to contain the violence. When news spread that the Tsar used string military force to restore order, other soldiers, police and members of the parliament joined the rebels with weapons at their sides. Nicholas received a telegram from the Chairman of the duma saying ‘state authority is totally paralysed and utterly unable to reimpose order. ’ With all authority having collapsed, Nicholas II abdicated marking the beginning of a new phase of Russian life. The Bolsheviks then took over the government under the command of Marxist, Vladimir Lenin and the Romanov Dynasty had finally reached its conclusion.